Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  8-9 / 52 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8-9 / 52 Next Page
Page Background

No single form of power generation is optimal in

all situations. Wind and solar are intermittent but

consume no fuel and emit no greenhouse gases.

Natural gas-fueled generation emits greenhouse

gases but it is dispatchable (i.e., has output that

can be readily controlled between maximum

rated capacity or decreased to zero) to help

balance supply and demand. It also has a relatively

low CAPEX ($/kW). Hydro power often requires

dedicating significant amounts of land area but is

renewable and dispatchable.

The Electric Power Research Institute created

the chart below to compare the advantages and

challenges of various forms of power generation

technologies. Although there may be specific

Assessment of relative benefit/impact

Coal

Coal w/CCS* Natural Gas Nuclear

Hydro

Wind Biomasss Geothermal

Solar

Photovoltaic

Construction cost

New plant construction cost for an

equivalent amount of generating capacity

Electricity cost

Projected cost to produce electricity

from a new plant over its lifetime

Land use

Area required to support fuel supply

and electricity generation

Water requirements

Amount of water required to generate

equivalent amount of electricity

CO

2

emissions

Relative amount of CO

2

emissions

per unit of electricity

Other air emissions

Relative amount of air emissions other

than CO

2

per unit of electricity

Waste products

Presence of other significant waste products

Availability

Ability to generate electricity when needed

Flexibility

Ability to quickly respond to changes in demand

Choosing Electricity Generation Technologies

Challenge

Advantage

*CCS: Carbon Capture and Storage

Assessment of relative benefit/impact

Coal

Coal w/CCS* Natural G s Nuclear

Hydro

Wind Biomasss Geothermal

Solar

Photovoltaic

Construction cost

New plant construction cost for an

equivalent amount of generating capacity

Electricity cost

Projected cost to produce electricity

from a new plant over its lifetime

Land use

Area required to support fuel supply

and electricity generation

Water requirements

Amount of water required to generate

equivalent amount of electricity

CO

2

emissions

Relative amount of CO

2

emissions

per unit of electricity

Other air emissions

Relative amount of air emissions other

than CO

2

per unit of electricity

Waste products

Presence of other significant waste products

Availability

Ability to generate electricity when needed

Flexibility

Ability to quickly respond to changes in demand

Choosing Electricity Gene at on T chnol gies

Challenge

Advantage

*CCS: Carbon Capture and Storage

Hybrid solutions:

defined

ELECTRICITY GENERATION

t chno l og i s

instances of power plants which do not align with

the relative ratings below, it is a good representation

of industry trends. The full comparison and

underlying basis for the ratings can be found at:

http://sites.epri.com/refcard/comparison.html

Hybrid power plants usually combine multiple

sources of power generation and/or energy storage,

and a control system to accentuate the positive

aspects and overcome the shortcomings of a

specific generation type, in order to provide power

that is more affordable, reliable and sustainable.

Each application is unique, and the hybrid solution

that works best for a specific situation will depend

on numerous factors including: existing generation

assets, transmission and distribution infrastructure,

market structure, and fuel prices and availability.

Each form of power generation has its pros and cons.

Source: Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Any statements, conclusions, summaries or other commentaries expressed herein do not reflect the

opinions or endorsement of EPRI.

8  / 

HYBRID SOLUTIONS

 / 

www.gepower.com/hybrid www.gepower.com/hybrid

 / 

HYBRID SOLUTIONS

 /  9

t rends

t rends